“Patriotic”?

Cubic light years of real and virtual ink has been, is, and will continue to be “spilled” about patriotism. Since the United States is celebrating it’s 250th birthday, that makes sense. I was deeply embedded in celebrations of the nation’s 200th birthday in 1976, and there wasn’t a big enough rock on the planet to hide under to avoid being aware of that….

I’ve written at length in various other spots on this blog and elsewhere about the squirmy and fluid attributes of language, and certain words – which in some contexts I’ve designated “weasel words” – are particularly susceptible to this attribute. Patriotism is one of the biggies.

Some background: I am a retired U.S. Navy veteran. Embedded in those military years is a period of time when I was in college and not in the Navy – when I served in the National Guard. I was in some sort of military from 1973 through 1996. I wouldn’t trade that experience for anything, and it played a big part in how I think of patriotism. I was nowhere near any kind of “front lines”. I was a Musician in the Navy and a Personnel Administrator in the National Guard, so firmly in the support and back office roles. Still, as was demonstrated in the Bible by how David treated the people in his community in the field before he was crowned king, the folks who didn’t go out to battle the foe but instead stayed behind and maintained the home base were as valuable as the warriors. There were no second-class occupations in his group. I got to play concerts for a lot of people in those years, many military and many public, that played a positive role in a number of different activities and events. I am pleased to have served.

So, what DOES patriotism mean to me? Good and interesting question. Once again, a problem is language. I have to use language to describe language, which is self-referential, and may not be really helpful. However, sometimes thinking of the word as a many-faceted jewel and using other language constructs to describe different angles of the gem can give a slightly more clear view of what I feel when I think of patriotism.

There’s another issue with language, by the way. In the particular case of the word “patriotism“, much of what composes my definition are feelings, perceptions, and wickedly-difficult-to-describe apprehensions. Arising from emotions, they become even more difficult to articulate. So, if this only gets muddled instead of clarified, I hope you grant me a little slack!

My baseline feeling about being a patriot is one of humility, and a mix of comfort and discomfort about my country’s aspirations and history.

The thing about aspirations is just that: they are aspirations – they are where you want to go. Principles towards which we orient who we want to be. I don’t feel that any of the Founders could have looked around when they wrote the founding documents and debated them in the late 18th century and said with any kind of credulity that what they were putting to parchment was “the way things are“. Good grief, NO!

The thing about history is that it happened. It is impossible to record all of any moment. History, therefore, is a slimmed down recording of something that happened. This something happened in the context of a particular moment with any number of different people and forces, none of which we are truly privy to. This recording is subject to a huge number of interpretations. I won’t go into all of the factors that influence that. Needless to say, since humans are involved, universal agreement on the interpretation of a moment in history is impossible.

So, aspirations and history…

For example, when they wrote that all men are created equal, while true as a statement of Being, it was a long way off of the implementation or actualization as a central tenet. It still is. What does that statement imply for government, law, culture, and business policy, let alone how we treat each other? We’re still working through it, sometimes more on the “discussing and convincing” side, sometimes more on the “banging each other on the head” side. The former is more civilized, but we Americans can be just as beastly as anyone else, especially to those close to and around us. Sadly, we don’t seem to have progressed as far on that front as many of us would have liked, but we keep trying. Americans can be a remarkably stubborn lot.

We get some things right. We get some things wrong. We always have and always will.

Be humble about our general fallibility and grateful for the bits that worked out for everyone. Patriotism can be the recognition of our Greater Community and not the creation of “Us vs. Them“. Remember the opening salvo from the Founders – “We the People

We are we.

Still Waiting For That Expert “Top Ten” List?

Top Ten

Top 10!

It’s not all that hard to be different, because you are.

I made an observation recently in a meeting about the tension we have in each of us to both fit in and be utterly unique. This applies to individuals (this is America, after all…individuals are a huge, almost obsessive focus of our attention…) and to our businesses and relationships. As a professional, I explain this to colleagues and clients this way: When, for instance, there is someone out there looking for a real estate agent, you don’t want them to think, “I’m going to call XYZ Mondo Real Estate!” You want them to think, “I’m going to call Janine at XYZ Mondo Real Estate!” You really want to have that kind of relationship with your VACC (Visitors/Audience/Customers/Community). Even though you may be part of a much larger organization or collective, YOU want to stand out.

I have an identical challenge. I have inhabited the digital and social media environment for some time. I know from observation and experience that certain kinds of articles and posts get more “juice” than others, and humans like to categorize and organize information quickly. In his book “Thinking, Fast and Slow”, Daniel Kahneman describes the two systems with which our mind works. First, sensory inputs are fed into System 1. System 1 takes the inputs and makes initial sense out of them. System 1′ s analysis is then fed to System 2. System 2 is the primary component of what we consider consciousness. The processing by System 2 completes the analysis of information within your mind. System 1 works on the economy of effort, and System 2 is the sense-making system. System 1 is much more likely to be intuitive, make quick, easy judgment and classification, and use short-cuts. System 2 digs in, uses much more “fuel” and gets tired as a result (hence the brain’s desire to use System 1 as much as possible.). The book is a TERRIFIC read, by the way, and my explanation here is paltry when compared to the richness to be found there when considering how our minds work….

Getting back to my thread of purpose here, the untold numbers of articles, “listicles” and posts that may be found across the Internet may or may not help you in your profession, but our minds crave that kind of quick-and-easy, how-to, tips-and-tricks writing. I have published a few articles in that vein when I felt that it was the best way to present the information and that it would be most helpful in that way. The bulk of my writing, as you have probably noticed, does not follow that format. I prefer to cover topics referring to the cognitive work in which we, as entrepreneurs, professionals, business owners and intelligent citizens, need to engage in order to be intentional and successful in our endeavors. Once a month I do a post featuring a collection of the five best articles I read that month, but I try to ensure that works within my particular context and message….a large part of which is “Think, Consider and be Authentic” (there’s a reason I call my blog “Authentic Voice“….).

This is not necessarily the most popular way to approach a Business Blog. My focus is more about our humanity, our strengths and limitations, what is important in our lives and business, and taking to account that our work is to support our lives, and not the other way around.  Being human, and treating others as human, not only exposes you as authentic but allows the building of the kinds of relationships with those around you, and your VACC, that will result in the kind of success worth gaining.

I know that this kind of writing may not be to the taste of many people….like I said, our minds are wired to consider information in the most economical way possible, so using our System 2 is harder, and almost no one likes “harder.” My hope is that you find great value in what I write and that you derive good from it. If you find a single item from any of my articles that lifts your business, improves your relationships with your VACC, and allows you to work through a business or individual challenge, then I have succeeded.

There are likely other topics you would like to see more about. If so, leave a comment here or visit my Social Sapiens web site and tell me via the contact form…or even give me a call. We are truly reaching for the same kinds of things together.

Do You Know The Lie of “Comfortable with Ambiguity”?

Caterpillar using a hookah. An illustration fr...

Caterpillar using a hookah. An illustration from Alice in Wonderland (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

How many jobs have you had where the expectation was that you would be “comfortable with ambiguity“?  Be honest….is anyone really Comfortable with Ambiguity?! Or is this just the company’s way of stating the obvious: everything changes, so hang on?

I wrote a post last year about being in the moment and how each moment was nearly certain to be different from the moment expected. Certainly my life is in a very different place now, and yours may be too.  I’ll bet it is, since this world is anything but static.
It’s interesting that I haven’t seen that particular phrase used quite as frequently as before (say 5 to 7 years ago…). Has anything changed? Has the workplace become more aware, more mindful of the realities and discomforts of change, thanks to greater awareness? There continues to be a lot of discussion of mindfulness in the workplace…perhaps this has created the environment where change and ambiguity don’t need to be called out. They are accepted as the norm and natural.

Continue reading

My weekend with COMCAST Support

TiVo Central on Comcast DVR

Image by stevegarfield via Flickr

I am not a BIG FAN of product support…..except, of course, when things go south. Perhaps it comes from the days when I operated in that capacity (and occasionally still do for at-home items, but I digress), or from the bad old days of sitting on hold for untold hours waiting for someone with the actual answer to give it to me, so I could fix the broken whatsit and get back to work/play/whatever.

Things have gotten better….

Continue reading

Don’t sweat the short stuff

Reading the newspaper: Brookgreen Gardens in P...

Image via Wikipedia

Bill Wasik, senior editor at Harper’s magazine, makes several interesting and interlacing points in his talk (seen here). I feel that his assertion that “short stuff” will never be monetized is essentially correct. Short posts by an author or organization are too much like Twitter, and most of these same authors Tweet their short stuff, so why would I pay for that?

Continue reading

Don’t sweat the short stuff

Reading the newspaper: Brookgreen Gardens in P...

Image via Wikipedia

Bill Wasik, senior editor at Harper’s magazine, makes several interesting and interlacing points in his talk (seen here). I feel that his assertion that “short stuff” will never be monetized is essentially correct. Short posts by an author or organization are too much like Twitter, and most of these same authors Tweet their short stuff, so why would I pay for that?

Continue reading

Stories are not words

Mars landscape

Image by gunnsteinlye via Flickr

When I tell a story, there is a distinct “movie” going through my head and the words are an attempt to express that “movie” in such a way that others can appreciate the story the same way I do. That covers the written narrative and some kind of multi-media or video representation of it. What about “static media” like graphics, paintings or illustrations?

Continue reading

Traveling the Road

The wheel was invented in circa 4000 BCE.

Image via Wikipedia

I have had a few careers so far: professional musician, music teacher/band director, software developer, college instructor, technology specialist for developers, consultant, product planner and product manager. Every one of them, along with every other subject I’ve ever studied and things for which I have a passion, are what I bring to what I do. My primary motivator in each of these is helping people (OK, so playing music is helping people enjoy themselves….or so I hope…).

Continue reading

Is this a good activity?

brian regan, again

Image by Malingering via Flickr

I am a big fan of the comedian Brian Regan.  He is the only artist I’ve ever seen from which I came away physically in pain because I was laughing so hard.  In one of his bits he tells about growing up in a household full of brothers who were, shall we say, “encouraged” by their mother to go outside and find a “good activity”.  Activities discovered were more or less not totally destructive…hilarity ensues.

Anyway, this thought always comes to me when I sit down to write. Although I can sit for long periods of time and spin out stories and opinions to friends and family, when I am confronted with a screen and a blank page, my mind goes into Choke Mode.  It’s not that I don’t have anything to say, it’s just that I’ve read so much great stuff from my colleagues and others that I follow across the web that I feel stymied about what I have to contribute.

This morning I ran across a post by Tac Anderson entitled “How to Blog a Lot” that, for some reason, pushed me over the edge (at least for today…).  His guidance is a little self-referential: in order to blog a lot, you should blog a lot.  A kind of “practice makes perfect (or at least better)” methodology.

Great advice. However, I, like most everyone who works with some kind of PC sitting in front of them all day, spend most of the day responding to e-mail, creating presentations, working on documents, attending meetings, Tweeting, etc.  In other words, taking the time out, as Tac suggests, first thing, going over the daily news and posts and then writing about what I find takes a discipline I haven’t really cultivated yet.  I guess part of my hesitation has to do with the organizational expectations around e-mail.  I have, in the past, tried to remind my colleagues (and myself in my more hassled moments) that e-mail is designed to be asynchronous and that it is unlikely that, if I do not respond to a particular mail for an additional 30+ minutes, the world will end or someone will die….just take a deep breath and allow myself to do something that may contribute to the conversation in the greater community that is the Web.  Then I can jump into the swamp-like morass that is daily e-mail.

So I guess this is a good activity……

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

An idea

Green

World Eye

That’s the idea: Green

I feel that there are a lot of possibilities with a more abstract phrase/word.  Aside from the most currently common definition today (environmentally friendly) and the obvious definition (um……well, green…), several others come to mind easily:

  • Sickly
  • Inexperienced
  • Overcome with envy

A few other associations come to mind:

  • green belt
  • green card
  • little green men
  • green thumb
  • greenback
  • greengrocer
  • greens keeping
  • green light
  • green tea

Given the breadth of experience and the depth of creative talent in this class, I feel that this would be an exciting topic.